不同修复方法修复口腔颌面部肿瘤术后缺损的效果比较

目的探讨不同修复方法修复口腔颌面部肿瘤术后缺损的效果。方法选取口腔颌面部肿瘤根治术后缺损患者89例,根据最终选取的修复方案分为A组(n=49)和B组(n=40),A组给予股前外侧嵌合皮瓣修复,B组给予串联皮瓣修复。观察2组手术情况,采用华盛顿大学头颈肿瘤生活质量量表(UW-QOL)对患者术后生活质量进行评价,检测唾液中唾液酸(SA)及癌胚抗原(CEA)水平。结果A组手术时间、胃管拔除时间和经口进食时间分别为(6.30±1.19)h、(19.77±2.81)d和(20.32±2.19)d,明显少于B组(P<0.05);但A组皮瓣制作时间为(1.20±0.28)h,明显多于B组(P<0.05)。A组术后6个月UW-QOL量表中外观、吞咽、咀嚼、言语、肩功能、情绪评分分别为(63.29±4.54)分、(54.93±5.03)分、(47.12±6.02)分、(64.49±4.33)分、(82.20±5.43)分和(75.50±7.20)分,明显高于B组(P<0.05)。A组和B组术后6个月UW-QOL量表中疼痛、活动、娱乐、味觉、唾液及焦虑评分比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。A组修复后1个月唾液中SA和CEA分别为(7.29±1.33)ng/dl和(50.04±16.62)ng/ml,明显低于B组(P<0.05)。A组血管危险发生率为2.04%,明显低于B组(P<0.05)。A组和B组感染、皮瓣坏死发生率差异比较无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论相比较串联皮瓣修复,股前外侧嵌合皮瓣修复口腔颌面部肿瘤根治术后缺损有较好的效果,可以改善患者生活质量。     

How can hospitals change practice to better implement smoking cessation interventions? A systematic review

Smoking cessation reduces the risk of death, improves recovery, and reduces the risk of hospital readmission. Evidence and policy support hospital admission as an ideal time to deliver smoking-cessation interventions. However, this is not well implemented in practice. In this systematic review, the authors summarize the literature on smoking-cessation implementation strategies and evaluate their success to guide the implementation of best-practice smoking interventions into hospital settings. The CINAHL Complete, Embase, MEDLINE Complete, and PsycInfo databases were searched using terms associated with the following topics: smoking cessation, hospitals, and implementation. In total, 14,287 original records were identified and screened, resulting in 63 eligible articles from 56 studies. Data were extracted on the study characteristics, implementation strategies, and implementation outcomes. Implementation outcomes were guided by Proctor and colleagues' framework and included acceptability, adoption, appropriateness, cost, feasibility, fidelity, penetration, and sustainability. The findings demonstrate that studies predominantly focused on the training of staff to achieve implementation. Brief implementation approaches using a small number of implementation strategies were less successful and poorly sustained compared with well resourced and multicomponent approaches. Although brief implementation approaches may be viewed as advantageous because they are less resource-intensive, their capacity to change practice in a sustained way lacks evidence. Attempts to change clinician behavior or introduce new models of care are challenging in a short time frame, and implementation efforts should be designed for long-term success. There is a need to embrace strategic, well planned implementation approaches to embed smoking-cessation interventions into hospitals and to reap and sustain the benefits for people who smoke.     

Anatomic vs. reverse shoulder arthroplasty for glenohumeral osteoarthritis with intact rotator cuff: a retrospective comparison of patient-reported outcomes using the systems outcomes database with up to 5-year follow-up

BackgroundThe growing enthusiasm for the use of reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) in the treatment of primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis (GHOA) with an intact rotator cuff is based on data derived from single-center studies with limited generalizability and follow-up. This study compared patient-reported outcomes (PROs) between RSA and total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) for the treatment of primary GHOA with up to 5-year follow-up and examined temporal trends in the treatment of GHOA between 2012 and 2021.MethodsA retrospective review was performed on patients with primary GHOA undergoing primary arthroplasty surgery from the Surgical Outcomes System global registry between 2012 and 2021. PROs including the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE) score, and visual analog scale (VAS) for pain were compared between RSA and TSA at 1, 2, and 5 years postoperatively.ResultsA total of 4451 patients were included, with 2693 (60.5%) undergoing TSA and 1758 (39.5%) undergoing RSA. Both RSA and TSA provided clinically excellent outcomes at 1 year postoperatively (ASES: 80.8 ± 17.9 vs. 85.9 ± 15.2, respectively; SANE: 74.8 ± 24.7 vs. 79.5 ± 22.9; VAS pain: 1.3 ± 2.0 vs. 1.1 ± 1.7; all P < .05) that were maintained at 2 years (ASES: 81.3 ± 19.3 vs. 87.3 ± 14.9; SANE: 74.8 ± 26.2 vs. 79.7 ± 24.7; VAS pain: 1.3 ± 2.1 vs. 1.0 ± 1.6; all P < .05) and 5 years (ASES: 81.7 ± 16.5 vs. 86.9 ± 15.3; SANE: 71.6 ± 28.5 vs. 78.2 ± 25.9; VAS pain: 1.0 ± 1.7 vs. 1.0 ± 1.7; all P < .05), with statistical significance favoring TSA. After controlling for age and sex, there was an adjusted difference of 4.5 units in the ASES score favoring TSA (P = .005) at 5 years postoperatively but no differences in adjusted SANE (P = .745) and VAS pain (P = .332) scores. The use of RSA for GHOA grew considerably over time, from representing only 17% of all replacements performed for GHOA in 2012 to nearly half (47%) in 2021 (P < .001).ConclusionRSA as a treatment for GHOA with an intact rotator cuff seems to yield PROs that are largely clinically equivalent to TSA extending to 5 years postoperatively. The observed statistical significance favoring TSA appears to be of marginal clinical benefit based on established minimal clinically important differences and may be a result of the large sample size. Further research using more granular clinical data and examining differences in range of motion and complications is warranted as it may change the value analysis.     

一种预测子宫内膜病变患者内膜病理类型的临床模型＊

目的 开发并评估一种用于预测子宫内膜病变患者内膜病理类型的临床模型；方法 选取2019年11月至2021年11月因妇科B超发现子宫内膜病变并于山东中医药大学附属医院行宫腔镜下内膜活检的患者，结合其病史与最小绝对收缩和选择算子法（Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator，LASSO）筛选影响内膜病变的独立危险因素，列线图（nomogram）函数建立列线图模型，采用ROC曲线下方的面积大小（Area Under Curve， AUC）、C指数（C-index）、拟合优度（Hosmer-Lemeshow）检验、自举法（bootstrap）评估及验证模型，依据列线图对纳入患者进行风险赋分，绘制ROC曲线获取风险评分的截断值，从而划分高低风险的人群；结果 阴道流血、绝经、无流产史、并发高血压、B超内膜厚度增厚、内膜回声不正常，中医证型为虚实夹杂证是发生子宫内膜癌及癌前病变的独立危险因素，评估模型所得AUC值与C-index均>0.9，Hosmer-Lemeshow检验显示P>0.05，bootstrap内部验证法所得C-index亦高于0.9，均说明模型准确度、区分度及可信度良好，当患者的风险评分总和≥177分时，属于高风险人群；结论 本模型可以预测B超提示子宫内膜病变患者的内膜病理类型为癌前或恶变型的概率并识别高风险人群。     

Deep learning radiomics based on contrast enhanced computed tomography predicts microvascular invasion and survival outcome in early stage hepatocellular carcinoma

ObjectiveTo evaluate the performance of a deep learning (DL)-based radiomics strategy on contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) to predict microvascular invasion (MVI) status and clinical outcomes, recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients with early stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) receiving surgical resection.MethodsAll 283 eligible patients were included retrospectively between January 2008 and December 2015, and assigned into the training cohort (n = 198) and the testing cohort (n = 85). We extracted radiomics features via handcrafted radiomics analysis manually and DL analysis of pretrained convolutional neural networks via transfer learning automatically. Support vector machine was adopted as the classifier. A clinical-radiological model for MVI status integrated significant clinical features and the radiological signature generated from the radiological model with the optimal area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC) in the testing cohort. Otherwise, DL-based prognostic models were constructed in prediction of recurrence and mortality via Cox proportional hazard analysis.ResultsThe clinical-radiological model for MVI represented an AUC of 0.909, accuracy of 96.47%, sensitivity of 90.91%, specificity of 97.30%, positive predictive value of 83.33%, and negative predictive value of 98.63% in the testing cohort. The clinical-radiological models for identification of RFS and OS outperformed prediction performance of the clinical model or the DL signature alone. The DL-based integrated model for prognostication showed great predictive value with significant classification and discrimination abilities after validation.ConclusionsThe integrated DL-based radiomics models achieved accurate preoperative prediction of MVI status, and might facilitate predicting tumor recurrence and mortality in order to optimize clinical decisions for patients with early stage HCC.     

Modification to Systemic Anticancer Therapy at the Start of the COVID-19 Pandemic and its Overall Impact on Survival Outcomes in Patients with Colorectal Cancer

BackgroundSince the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic, multiple changes to the provision of cancer care has been introduced to maximize patient safety and protect staff. We aimed to identify factors influencing clinicians’ decision on treatment modification during the initial phase of the pandemic, and to assess its impact on outcomes in patients with colorectal cancer.Patients and MethodsElectronic records of patients seen in a large United Kingdom tertiary cancer center was reviewed. The frequency and type of changes to systemic anticancer therapy , as well as the factors predicting clinicians’ decision were assessed.ResultsA total of 418 patients; mean age 63 ± 12 years and 57% male were included. More than half of the patients had modification to their treatment; with treatment delay (21%) or cancellation (10%), being the most common. Majority of patients on neoadjuvant treatment (97%) proceeded with treatment, with some form of treatment modification in 20%. Half of patients on adjuvant treatment had their treatment plan modified. Overall, a change in treatment was more likely in older patients (OR 1.028 [95% CI 1.010-1.047]; P = .002), and in patients who had already received higher number of cycles of systemic anticancer therapy (OR 1.040 [95% CI 1.016-1.065]; P = .001). A change in treatment was less likely further out of the first national lockdown (OR 0.837 [95% CI 0.758-0.925]; P < .001). Patients on third-line treatment were most likely to have alterations to their treatment plan (69%, n=33/48).ConclusionDuring the first wave of COVID-19 in the United Kingdom, clinicians adapted clinical practice in accordance to local and national guidance, especially amongst older patients and those on third-line treatment. Further real-world data are needed to document the important impact of changes to treatment on outcomes in patients with cancer.     

Self-reported outcomes of a randomized trial comparing three community health worker interventions for diabetes prevention among Cambodian Americans with depression

ObjectiveCambodian Americans have complex, interrelated and persistent medical and mental health problems stemming from genocide and the social determinants of health. We examined changes in multiple domains of self-reported health outcomes from a diabetes prevention trial. Methods: Cambodian Americans with depression and high risk for diabetes (n = 188) were randomized to one of three community health worker interventions: lifestyle vs lifestyle plus medication therapy management vs social services. Assessments were at baseline, 12- and 15-months. Results: The typical participant was 55 years old, female, earned below $20,000 annually, and had 7 years of education. About one-third were taking antidepressant medication and over half had elevated depressive symptoms. Relative to social services, lifestyle and lifestyle plus medication therapy management were both similarly effective at increasing diabetes knowledge, nutrition habits, sleep quality and decreasing pain; 2) lifestyle alone was superior to social services for self-reported health; and, 3) all three groups showed improved anxiety and insomnia. There were no effects on physical activity or physical functioning. Conclusion: Community health worker interventions have multiple benefits beyond delaying diabetes. Practice Implications: Health promotion programs that are designed and delivered appropriately can impact even hard to reach and hard to treat groups.     

Circulating angiotensin converting enzyme 2 and COVID-19

The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has triggered a widespread outbreak since December 2019. The SARS-CoV-2 infection-related illness has been dubbed the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) by the World Health Organization. Asymptomatic and subclinical infections, a severe hyper-inflammatory state, and mortality are all examples of clinical signs. After attaching to the angiotensin converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) receptor, the SARS-CoV-2 virus can enter cells through membrane fusion and endocytosis. In addition to enabling viruses to cling to target cells, the connection between the spike protein (S-protein) of SARS-CoV-2 and ACE2 may potentially impair the functionality of ACE2. Blood pressure is controlled by ACE2, which catalyzes the hydrolysis of the active vasoconstrictor octapeptide angiotensin (Ang) II to the heptapeptide Ang-(1-7) and free L-Phe. Additionally, Ang I can be broken down by ACE2 into Ang-(1-9) and metabolized into Ang-(1-7). Numerous studies have demonstrated that circulating ACE2 (cACE2) and Ang-(1-7) have the ability to restore myocardial damage in a variety of cardiovascular diseases and have anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, anti-apoptotic, and anti-cardiomyocyte fibrosis actions. There have been some suggestions for raising ACE2 expression in COVID-19 patients, which might be used as a target for the creation of novel treatment therapies. With regard to this, SARS-CoV-2 is neutralized by soluble recombinant human ACE2 (hrsACE2), which binds the viral S-protein and reduces damage to a variety of organs, including the heart, kidneys, and lungs, by lowering Ang II concentrations and enhancing conversion to Ang-(1-7). This review aims to investigate how the presence of SARS-CoV-2 and cACE2 are related. Additionally, there will be discussion of a number of potential therapeutic approaches to tip the ACE/ACE-2 balance in favor of the ACE-2/Ang-(1-7) axis.